Nursing Forum

Introduction. Increased life expectancy leads to consequent long-term care needs, where informal caregivers may experience overload and strain associated with caregiving, influencing the well-being and health of individuals and eventually leading to an effort to fulfill their role. Within this context, a condition called caregiver role strain has been identified. Objective. To investigate the clinical indicators of the nursing diagnosis caregiver role strain as described in the literature. Materials and Methods. This study is a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy conducted in October 2023, following the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The review protocol was registered and approved in the Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews under registration number CRD42022377411. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias and quality of the studies. The databases included SciVerse Scopus (Elsevier), MEDLINE/PubMed (via National Library of Medicine), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), CINAHL with Full Text (EBSCO), and PsycINFO (APA), with 48 articles included for quantitative synthesis. Results. Fourteen defining characteristics were identified from the literature, with a predominance of the following indicators: depressive symptoms (45.8%), anxiety (41.6%), physical decline (31.2%), fatigue (22.9%), disturbed sleep pattern (20.8%), emotional disturbance, and irritability (16.6%). The findings suggest that, within the defined circumstances and limitations of the study, examining defining characteristics for the diagnosis caregiver role strain holds potential for advancing scientific knowledge regarding human responses to the challenges experienced by caregivers. Evidence for Practice. The study aligns with clinically relevant indicators crucial for refining and updating the diagnosis, thereby enhancing its level of evidence and clinical accuracy. Simultaneously, it supports addressing the gap in caregiver support and standardized nursing care plans.

Introduction. Effective​ self-reporting of medication administration errors (MAEs) is crucial for patient safety globally, yet underreporting persists as a significant challenge, hindering policy interventions. Despite extensive studies on barriers to MAE reporting by nurses, limited attention has been given to this issue in Ghana. This study aimed to explore the reasons behind nurses’ reluctance to report MAEs, contributing to a broader understanding of this critical issue. Methods. A cross-sectional study was conducted among registered nurses at two public health facilities in the Ashanti Region, Ghana. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 153 respondents using stratified and simple random sampling. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including chi-square and logistic regression, were employed to analyze 150 completed questionnaires using SPSS version 23, with a significance level set at . Results. The majority (60.7%) of nurses reported MAEs, primarily to the ward in-charge (72.0%) and documented in the incidence book (54.3%), while only 9% reported to patients. Reasons for nonreporting included fear of criticism (34.5%), litigation (19.5%), losing practice licenses (18.6%), and stigma (17.7%). Significant correlations were found between nurses’ sociodemographic characteristics (age, marital status, years of practice, and rank) and their self-reporting of MAEs (). Conclusion. Despite high levels of self-reported MAEs among nurses, fear remains a pervasive barrier to reporting. Addressing the culture of blame, criticism, and stigma is imperative to enhance nurses’ confidence in reporting MAEs globally, transcending geographical boundaries and fostering patient safety on a broader scale.

Purpose. Breast cancer is considered a huge health problem among women all over the world due to its increased mortality rate. Breast cancer deaths are decreased by 28–34% due to improvement in treatment and early detection. In order to detect breast cancer early and provide the best possible therapy, knowledge and awareness are essential. So, this study aimed to assess risk of breast cancer among nurses, the knowledge and practices of breast self-examination (BSE) and determine its barriers, and implement an educational program for them. Design. A quasiexperimental research design was used. Methods. This study was conducted at two university hospitals (main university hospital and woman’s health hospital). A purposive sample of 280 nurses with age more than thirty-five years were included in the study using three tools, namely, structure interview questionnaire, breast cancer risk assessment tool, and a structured breast cancer knowledge and practice questionnaire. Nurses’ knowledge and practices regarding breast cancer and BSE were first assessed and then they were provided with two educational courses covering theoretical and practical information. One month after the program ended, the nurses’ knowledge and practices were assessed again. Results. About 3.2% of the participants have five years high risk of developing breast cancer according the risk assessment tool, the main barriers of do not do BSE did not find any symptoms and scared from finding any abnormality. There was a significant increase in knowledge and practice of breast self-examination posteducation compared to pre-education (73.2 and 98.2%, respectively). Also, there was a statistically significant difference between pre- and postprogram with a value of 0.0001. Conclusion. This study concluded that 3.2% of the nurses with high risk of developing breast cancer needed a follow-up; more than half of them do not perform breast self-examination because they think that do not have any symptoms in the breast and the educational program with a significant effect on knowledge and practices of nurses. So, the researchers recommend the nurses need for an empowerment program and support by providing assistance in places of work as done free clinical examination and mammography by female specialist for privacy.

As modern nursing advances at an astounding rate, existential advocacy (EA) is vital for delivering patient care in line with wellness goals and personal values. This concept analysis aims to define EA within the context of nursing and align the concept with Jean Watson’s Unitary Caring Science (UCS) and her 10 Caritas Processes. A comprehensive literature search identified 12 relevant publications from the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and CINAHL. Subsequently, utilizing Walker and Avant’s method for concept analysis, a standardized structure to identify EA’s defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents emerged. Antecedents for EA are patient vulnerability, nurse-patient rapport, nurse autonomy to act as an advocate, and patient request for advocacy. Defining attributes of EA include the following: supporting patient self-determination, caring-trusting nurse-patient relationship, promoting individualized meaning of health and wellness, and encouraging values-based problem-solving. The optimal consequence of EA is patients’ awareness of their current health status, leading to individualized care and decision-making based on a patient’s values. EA is a nurse’s effort to support and promote their patients’ right to self-determination by helping them discern their holistic health and wellness situation and then clarify their values within that reality. Watson’s UCS and 10 Caritas Processes align with EA to facilitate nurse-patient transpersonal caring occasions. EA explicates the care and advocacy nurses provide into a defined concept while highlighting nurses’ essential role in patients’ physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. With EA better defined, the concept can be assessed, measured, and implemented within the discipline of nursing.

Background. The mnemonic learning method is a systematic approach that helps nursing students memorize new information more effectively, productively, and easily by connecting new information with existing information and exploring unfamiliar information through visual images or combinations of letters and words. While mnemonics can help students remember specific information, it is essential to examine how well they facilitate the transfer of learning to real-world nursing practice. Aim. To investigate the effect of the mnemonic learning strategy on critical care nursing students’ tracheal suction skill acquisition and learning satisfaction. Methods. A quasi-experimental research design was used. A total of 280 second-year nursing students enrolled in critical care and emergency nursing courses were recruited. These students were assigned to study and control groups. The study group used a mnemonic learning strategy to recall the steps involved in the tracheal suction procedure, while the control group used the traditional learning strategy. Two tools were used for data collection: the tracheal suction procedure checklist and learning satisfaction scale. Comparisons between both groups regarding their performance and satisfaction scores were done. Results. Performance scores regarding the tracheal suction procedure were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group in the 5^th, 6^th, and 10^th weeks (, <0.001, and <0.001). A total of 70.6% of the participants in the study group reported high satisfaction using the mnemonic learning experience. Conclusion. Using a mnemonic learning strategy with critical care nursing students was effective. Participants in the study group exhibited improvement in their tracheal suction procedure scores over time. Critical care nursing students reported higher levels of learning satisfaction with the mnemonic learning method than with the traditional method.

Aim. To examine and clarify the concept financial health literacy (FHL) within the context of aging and healthcare. Background. Older adults have a high chronic disease burden and low financial and health literacy levels which often leads to high healthcare costs and poor self-management. Clarification of the concept FHL is necessary to better support nursing care and successful self-management. Design. Concept analysis using literary synthesis. Data Sources. Electronic databases were used to find scientific literature (i.e., PubMed, CINAHL, and Business Source Complete), and online dictionaries were used to find basic definitions. Review Methods. Walker and Avant’s eight-step method was used as a guide to construct a concept analysis of FHL. Clinical, aging, financial, and economic studies were reviewed to determine defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences of FHL on the older adult’s health. Results. FHL is defined as the knowledge, skills, and ability to make decisions that allow an individual to manage finances to optimally meet healthcare-related and household expenses, including resources to self-manage health, and plan for short-term, long-term, and end-of-life healthcare. Personal context, opportunity, and access are antecedents to FHL. There are 3 defining attributes: knowledge about health and financial-related concepts, skills in health and financial planning, and healthcare and financial-related decision-making behaviors. The 4 consequences of FHL include effective healthcare utilization, effective cost management, effective self-management, and positive health outcomes. Conclusions. FHL is a complex, multidimensional concept. A better understanding of this concept has significant nursing implications for research, clinical, practice, education, and policy development. Older adults have unique health and financial needs due to the complexity of retirement, living on a fixed income, and self-management of chronic diseases. Development of a FHL assessment tool and intervention is needed and may be supported based on the results of this concept analysis.