WOW.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: won't grammar

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Contraction (grammar) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraction_(grammar)

    A contraction is a shortened version of the spoken and written forms of a word, syllable, or word group, created by omission of internal letters and sounds.. In linguistic analysis, contractions should not be confused with crasis, abbreviations and initialisms (including acronyms), with which they share some semantic and phonetic functions, though all three are connoted by the term ...

  3. English auxiliary verbs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_auxiliary_verbs

    English auxiliary verbs are a small set of English verbs, which include the English modal auxiliary verbs and a few others.: 19 : 11–12 Although the auxiliary verbs of English are widely believed to lack inherent semantic meaning and instead to modify the meaning of the verbs they accompany, they are nowadays classed by linguists as auxiliary on the basis not of semantic but of grammatical ...

  4. Double negative - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative

    t. e. A double negative is a construction occurring when two forms of grammatical negation are used in the same sentence. This is typically used to convey a different shade of meaning from a strictly positive sentence ("You're not unattractive" vs "You're attractive"). Multiple negation is the more general term referring to the occurrence of ...

  5. Ain't - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ain't

    Ain't. ain't is a negative inflection for am, is, are, has, and have in informal English. In some dialects, it is also used for do, does, did, and will. The development of ain't for the various forms of be, have, will and do occurred independently, at different times. The use of ain't for the forms of be was established by the mid-18th century ...

  6. Apophasis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophasis

    Apophasis. Apophasis ( / əˈpɒfəsɪs /; from Ancient Greek ἀπόφασις (apóphasis), from ἀπόφημι (apóphemi) 'to say no') [1] [2] is a rhetorical device wherein the speaker or writer brings up a subject by either denying it, or denying that it should be brought up. [3] Accordingly, it can be seen as a rhetorical relative of ...

  7. History of English grammars - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_English_grammars

    History of English grammars. The history of English grammars [1] [2] begins late in the sixteenth century with the Pamphlet for Grammar by William Bullokar. In the early works, the structure and rules of English grammar were based on those of Latin. A more modern approach, incorporating phonology, was introduced in the nineteenth century.

  8. List of commonly misused English words - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_commonly_misused...

    Non-standard: I won't go sense I have no fuel. Non-standard: I can since your aura. cite, sight and site. A sight is something seen; a site is a place. To cite is to quote or list as a source. Standard: You are a sight for sore eyes. Standard: I found a list of the sights of Rome on a tourist site. Standard: Please cite the sources you used in ...

  9. English modal verbs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couldn't

    The principal English modal verbs are can, could, may, might, shall, should, will, would, and must. Certain other verbs are sometimes classed as modals; these include ought, had better, and (in certain uses) dare and need. Verbs which share only some of the characteristics of the principal modals are sometimes called "quasi-modals", "semi ...

  1. Ads

    related to: won't grammar