WOW.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. FCC fines wireless carriers for sharing user locations ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/fcc-fines-wireless-carriers...

    The FCC hit Verizon with a $47 million penalty, and AT&T was issued a $57 million fee. The Federal Communications Commission has leveraged nearly $200 million in fines against wireless carriers AT ...

  3. Column: After a years-long pause, the FCC resurrects 'network ...

    www.aol.com/news/column-years-long-pause-fcc...

    By categorizing broadband services as "information services," it relinquished its right to address consumer complaints about crummy service, or even collect data on outages.

  4. List of mobile network operators in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mobile_network...

    *AT&T's subscriber count includes over 127 million "connected devices", while Verizon and T-Mobile numbers do not, leading to inconsistent subscriber figures. [10] [11] [12] With this omission, AT&T Mobility would rank third in subscriber count at 113.8 million [ citation needed ] , trailing both Verizon and T-Mobile, respectively.

  5. AG announces settlement to stop 'deceptive advertising' of ...

    www.aol.com/ag-announces-settlement-stop...

    May 12, 2024 at 6:18 PM. May 12—WILKES-BARRE — Attorney General Michelle Henry this week announced a $10.25 million, 50-jurisdiction settlement with several major mobile device service ...

  6. Cramming (fraud) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramming_(fraud)

    Cramming is a form of fraud in which small charges are added to a bill by a third party without the subscriber's consent, approval, authorization or disclosure. These may be disguised as a tax, some other common fee or a bogus service, and may be several dollars or even just a few cents. The crammer's intent is that the subscriber will overlook ...

  7. Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2014) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc...

    Laurence H. Silberman. Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 740 F.3d 623 (D.C. Cir., 2014), was a case at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacating portions of the FCC Open Internet Order of 2010, which the court determined could only be applied to common carriers and not to Internet service providers. [1]

  8. Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc...

    Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, often shortened to Verizon v. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398 (2004), is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the field of Antitrust law. It held that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 had not modified the framework of the Sherman Act, preserving claims that satisfy ...

  9. His alarm line was unplugged for 19 years, but Verizon kept ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/alarm-line-unplugged-19...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us