WOW.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson

    Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.

  3. City of Boerne v. Flores - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Boerne_v._Flores

    City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the scope of Congress 's power of enforcement under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case also had a significant impact on historic preservation. In this case, the Court struck down the Religious Freedom ...

  4. Van Orden v. Perry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Orden_v._Perry

    Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case involving whether a display of the Ten Commandments on a monument given to the government at the Texas State Capitol in Austin violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. In a suit brought by Thomas Van Orden of Austin ...

  5. Lawrence v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

    Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that U.S. state laws criminalizing sodomy between consenting adults are unconstitutional. [ a ] [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The Court reaffirmed the concept of a " right to privacy " that earlier cases had found the U.S. Constitution provides, even though it ...

  6. Powell v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_v._Texas

    VIII. Powell v. Texas, 392 U.S. 514 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case that ruled that a Texas statute criminalizing public intoxication did not violate the Eighth Amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishment. The 5–4 decision's plurality opinion was by Justice Thurgood Marshall. Justice Hugo Black and Byron White ...

  7. Hernandez v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hernandez_v._Texas

    Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 (1954), was a landmark case, "the first and only Mexican-American civil-rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court during the post-World War II period." [ 1 ] In a unanimous ruling, the court held that Mexican Americans and all other nationality groups in the United States have equal ...

  8. List of Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas cases

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Supreme_Court_of...

    Concerning headwright certificates issued to families residing in Texas on the date independence was declared. Herbert v. Moore, Dallam 592 (1844). Determined that Indians were not sovereign nations, the rule of postliminy did not apply to property taken by Indians. Republic v. Inglish, Dallam 608 (1844). To obtain a land grant, it must be ...

  9. San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Antonio_Independent...

    v. t. e. San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that San Antonio Independent School District 's financing system, which was based on local property taxes, was not a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment 's equal protection clause.