WOW.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a Citable Source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_a...

    Importance. Research papers, particularly the one research paper students write in their eleventh grade, have always been an integral part of high school education.They stress the need to verify information and teach students how to evaluate sources critically, and as a result, teachers have developed various criteria to help students identify credible sources, an especially important skill in ...

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    For example, a web site that purports to list an artist's works is likely reliable for the fact that the artist authored a specific work, if the web site list meets other criteria for reliability (e.g., not under control of the artist or otherwise questionable), and especially if the list has some further indicia of reliability of existence and ...

  4. Wikipedia:Citing sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources

    If you have a URL (web page) link, you can add it to the title part of the citation, so that when you add the citation to Wikipedia the URL becomes hidden and the title becomes clickable. To do this, enclose the URL and the title in square brackets—the URL first, then a space, then the title. For example:

  5. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not...

    This page in a nutshell: Do not use a Wikipedia article as a source for another Wikipedia article. Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. As a user-generated source, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or simply ...

  6. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    Reliability of Wikipedia. Article instability and susceptibility to cognitive biases are two potential problem areas in a crowdsourced work like Wikipedia. The reliability of Wikipedia and its user-generated editing model, particularly its English-language edition, has been questioned and tested. Wikipedia is written and edited by volunteer ...

  7. Wikipedia:Academic use - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use

    Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea. However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered ...

  8. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    w.wiki/FVY. In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than editors' beliefs, opinions, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information.

  9. Wikipedia:Credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Credibility

    Wikipedia's credibility has improved during its lifetime. Wikipedia allows anyone to edit its contents and this can undermine its credibility. An illustrious professor could post content and a " troll " or uninformed individual could easily overwrite it, with or without a malicious agenda. Wikipedia addresses this concern with internal ...