WOW.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_v_Lee's_Air_Farming_Ltd

    Separate legal personality. Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd [1960] UKPC 33 is a company law case from New Zealand, also important for UK company law and Indian Companies Act 2013, concerning the corporate veil and separate legal personality. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council reasserted that a company is a separate legal entity, so that a ...

  3. File:Company law and precedents (IA companylawpreced01stie ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Company_law_and...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  4. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Lee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_K._Liggett_Co._v._Lee

    Brandeis. Dissent. Cardozo, joined by Stone. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Lee, 288 U.S. 517 (1933), is a corporate law decision from the United States Supreme Court. [1] In his opinion, Justice Brandeis endorsed the theories that state corporate law, and lack of federal standards, enabled a race to the bottom in corporate law rules, or one of "laxity".

  5. Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co (GB) Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daimler_Co_Ltd_v...

    Keywords. Control, enemy character, lifting the veil. Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd [1916] 2 AC 307 is a UK company law case, concerning the concept of "control" and enemy character of a company. It is usually discussed in the context of lifting the corporate veil, however it is merely an example of where ...

  6. History of company law in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_company_law_in...

    The history of company law in the United Kingdom concerns the change and development in UK company law within the context of the history of companies, deriving from its predecessors in Roman and English law. Company law in its current form dates from the mid-nineteenth century, however other forms of business association developed long before.

  7. Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebrahimi_v_Westbourne...

    Mr Ebrahimi and Mr Nazar were partners. They decided to incorporate as the business was highly successful, buying and selling expensive rugs. Their store was originally in Nottingham, and then moved to London at 220 Westbourne Grove. Mr Ebrahimi and Mr Nazar were the sole shareholders in the company. All profits were paid as directorial ...

  8. Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macaura_v_Northern...

    Facts. Mr Macaura owned the Killymoon estate in County Tyrone, Northern Ireland. He sold the timber there to Irish Canadian Sawmills Ltd for 42,000 fully paid up £1 shares, making him the whole owner (with nominees). Mr Macaura was also an unsecured creditor for £19,000. He got insurance policies - but in his own name, not the company's ...

  9. Panorama Developments (Guildford) Ltd v Fidelis Furnishing ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panorama_Developments...

    Facts. Fidelis’ company secretary, Mr Bayne, hired cars from Panorama Development's business, Belgravia Executive Car Rental. Bayne used the Fidelis' paper and represented that he wished to hire a number of Rolls-Royce 's and Jaguars for the business while his managing director was away. He was lying and he used them himself.