WOW.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the ...

  3. Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

    Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the ...

  4. Psychological Review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_Review

    Psychological Review is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal that covers psychological theory.It was established by James Mark Baldwin (Princeton University) and James McKeen Cattell (Columbia University) in 1894 as a publication vehicle for psychologists not connected with the laboratory of G. Stanley Hall (Clark University), who often published in his American Journal of Psychology.

  5. Psychological research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_research

    The peer review process is another aspect of psychological research that has been criticized. Though there are some positive aspects to the peer review process, it is not designed well enough to detect fraud. There are many studies that have passed through several peer reviews that have later been found to be fraudulent. [36]

  6. Scientific method - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

    The process of peer review involves the evaluation of the experiment by experts, who typically give their opinions anonymously. Some journals request that the experimenter provide lists of possible peer reviewers, especially if the field is highly specialized.

  7. Annual Review of Psychology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_Review_of_Psychology

    Annual Review of Psychology. The Annual Review of Psychology is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes review articles about psychology. First published in 1950, its longest-serving editors have been Mark Rosenzweig (1969–1994) and Susan Fiske (2000–present). As of 2023, Annual Review of Psychology is being published as open access ...

  8. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_Review_of_Clinical...

    Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. The Annual Review of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes an annual volume of review articles relevant to clinical psychology. It was established in 2005 and is published by Annual Reviews. As of 2024, the editor is Tyrone D. Cannon; previous editors include Thomas Widiger ...

  9. Confirmation bias - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

    The social process of peer review aims to mitigate the effect of individual scientists' biases, even though the peer review process itself may be susceptible to such biases [97] [98] [91] [99] [100] Confirmation bias may thus be especially harmful to objective evaluations regarding nonconforming results since biased individuals may regard ...