WOW.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: peer paper review process

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sham peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sham_peer_review

    Sham peer review or malicious peer review is a name given to the abuse of a medical peer review process to attack a doctor for personal or other non-medical reasons. [1] The American Medical Association conducted an investigation of medical peer review in 2007 and concluded that while it is easy to allege misconduct and 15% of surveyed physicians indicated that they were aware of peer review ...

  3. Springer Nature - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Springer_Nature

    The company retracted a paper in 2019, in its journal BMC Emergency Medicine due to a dubious peer-review process (a herpetologist could have denied the publication of the paper). [ 40 ] In August 2020, Springer Nature was reported to have rejected the publication of an article at the behest of its co-publisher, Wenzhou Medical University ...

  4. Peer-to-Patent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-Patent

    Review continues for four months, after which the patent examiner conducts an expedited examination of the patent application. Potentially stronger patents. If Peer to Patent review works as expected, patents that survive the process have already undergone considerable scrutiny and will be less at risk of a successful challenge later. Public ...

  5. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_Symposium_on_Security...

    The review process for the conference tends to evaluate the papers on a variety of criteria with a focus on novelty. In 2022, researchers interviewed reviewers from top security conferences like IEEE S&P and found that the review process of the conferences was exploitable due to inconsistent reviewing standards across reviewers.

  6. Scientific literature - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_literature

    Review process. The peer-review process contributes to the quality control and it is an essential step to ascertain the standing and originality of the research. [14] Redundant Publications. Publications that contain copyrighted and new unpublished material. [15] Data Fabrications.

  7. MDPI - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MDPI

    MDPI (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute) is a publisher of open-access scientific journals.It publishes over 390 peer-reviewed, open access journals. [2] [3] MDPI is among the largest publishers in the world in terms of journal article output, [4] [5] and is the largest publisher of open access articles.

  8. Peer assessment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_assessment

    Peer assessment, or self-assessment, is a process whereby students or their peers grade assignments or tests based on a teacher's benchmarks. [1] The practice is employed to save teachers time and improve students' understanding of course materials as well as improve their metacognitive skills.

  9. Scientific writing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_writing

    The paper will typically end with an acknowledgments section, giving proper attribution to any other contributors besides the main author(s). In order to get published, papers must go through peer review by experts with significant knowledge in the field. During this process, papers may get rejected or edited with adequate justification. [36]

  1. Ads

    related to: peer paper review process