WOW.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. CNET - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNET

    CNET. CNET (short for "Computer Network") [1] is an American media website that publishes reviews, news, articles, blogs, podcasts, and videos on technology and consumer electronics globally. CNET originally produced content for radio and television in addition to its website before applying new media distribution methods through its internet ...

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an uninterrupted request for comment on the source's reliability that took place on the reliable sources noticeboard. For a discussion to be considered significant, most editors expect no fewer than ...

  4. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    Reliability of Wikipedia. Article instability and susceptibility to cognitive biases are two potential problem areas in a crowdsourced work like Wikipedia. The reliability of Wikipedia and its user-generated editing model, particularly its English-language edition, has been questioned and tested. Wikipedia is written and edited by volunteer ...

  5. Wirecutter (website) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirecutter_(website)

    Ben Frumin (as of 2020) [1] URL. www .nytimes .com /wirecutter. Commercial. yes. Wirecutter (formerly known as The Wirecutter) is a product review website owned by The New York Times Company. It was founded by Brian Lam in 2011 and purchased by The New York Times Company in 2016 for about $30 million. [2] [3] [4] [5]

  6. Wikipedia : Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-26/Dispatches

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia...

    Some sites have proven reliable for some purposes: examples include (but are not limited to) IGN, CNET and Cricinfo. If the site gives its sources, but still seems like a personal site, it should be questioned. Depending on the text that is being sourced, it could be reliable, but all self-published sources must meet WP:SPS.

  7. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Ideal sources for biomedical assertions include general or systematic reviews in reliable, independent, published sources, such as reputable medical journals, widely recognised standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or medical guidelines and position statements from nationally or internationally reputable expert bodies.

  8. Wikipedia : Understanding Wikipedia's content standards

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Understanding...

    The underlying principles are covered in the policy about original research and depend on the concepts of primary and secondary sources: the government report is a primary source, and the publication whose editorial staff contextualizes it is the secondary source. Wikipedia strongly prefers secondary sources. (There are also tertiary sources ...

  9. Wikipedia:Reliable sources for software articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    WP:RSFS. The Wikipedia articles should rely on and reference reliable sources. Being an essay, this document provides a commentary on application of corresponding policy to the articles about software. Software includes all code or programming meant to be operated by a computer or dedicated computing device such as a game console.