WOW.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: how to know if a website is credible

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    Reliability of Wikipedia. Article instability and susceptibility to cognitive biases are two potential problem areas in a crowdsourced work like Wikipedia. The reliability of the online encyclopedia Wikipedia and its user-generated editing model, particularly its English-language edition, has been questioned and tested.

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    For example, a web site that purports to list an artist's works is likely reliable for the fact that the artist authored a specific work, if the web site list meets other criteria for reliability (e.g., not under control of the artist or otherwise questionable), and especially if the list has some further indicia of reliability of existence and ...

  4. FactCheck.org - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FactCheck.org

    FactCheck.org is a nonprofit [1] website that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics by providing original research on misinformation and hoaxes. [2] It is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, and is funded primarily by the ...

  5. Identify legitimate AOL websites, requests, and communications

    help.aol.com/articles/identify-legitimate-aol...

    Identify legitimate AOL websites, requests, and communications. Scammers and bad actors are always looking for ways to get personal info with malicious intent. Know how to recognize legitimate AOL websites, requests, and communications to keep your account secure.

  6. Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Bias/Fact_Check

    Media Bias/Fact Check ( MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by Dave M. Van Zandt. [1] It considers four main categories and multiple subcategories in assessing the "political bias" and "factual reporting" of media outlets. [2] [3] It is widely used, but has been criticized for its methodology. [4]

  7. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    w.wiki/FVY. In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than editors' beliefs, opinions, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information.

  8. Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    See also. References. Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources. WP:PUS. Wikipedia's requirement for writing articles is " verifiability, not truth ". We rely on what is written in external sources to write this encyclopedia, yet not all sources are equal. The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and ...

  9. Wikipedia:Assessing reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assessing...

    Particularly if there are few sources listed, it is a good idea to scan those sources to see if they are reliable. Unreliable sources include most blogs and personal websites, although some of these are reliable. Reliable sources include most newspaper and magazine articles, online encyclopedias, and other professional publications such as books.

  1. Ads

    related to: how to know if a website is credible