Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Check out The Sacramento Bee’s list of political fact-checking websites and guides before you cast your vote. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ...
Africa Check was launched by Peter Cunliffe-Jones after it won an International Press Institute news innovation contest sponsored by Google. [2] It was modelled after FactCheck.org and PolitiFact.com and is the first website in South Africa to focus only on fact checking.
Full Fact was founded in 2009 by businessman Michael Samuel, the charity's chair, and Will Moy, who served as director.It has 18 staff as of 2019. [2] Moy had been working as a researcher for Lord Low and noticed that lobbyists often provided inaccurate briefings to legislators, [3] while Samuel had been concerned about accuracy in public debate for some years.
In July 2020, the International Fact-Checking Network certified the company's Logically Facts unit as a fact-checker. The certification was renewed in September 2021 and January 2023. The certification was renewed in September 2021 and January 2023.
Quote Investigator is a website that fact-checks the reported origins of widely circulated quotes. It was started in 2010 by Gregory F. Sullivan, a former Johns Hopkins University computer scientist who runs the site under the pseudonym Garson O'Toole.
Climate Feedback is a fact-checking website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to climate change. It discloses its methodologies, is certified by the International Fact-Checking Network, and has been endorsed by other reliable sources.
The website has identified errors in content published by outlets, such as Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, The Mail on Sunday and New York magazine. [4] [5] The website is included in the database of global fact-checking sites by the Reporters' Lab at Duke University. [13] Currently, Emmanuel Vincent serves as director. [2]
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by Dave M. Van Zandt. [1] It considers four main categories and multiple subcategories in assessing the "political bias" and "factual reporting" of media outlets, [2] [3] relying on a self-described "combination of objective measures and subjective analysis".